Home Members Only Find Member News Join PaTLA Consumers Login Logout Renew
 

News & Case Notes
� 
Subscribe to the Newsletter
� 
PaTLA E-Newsletters
� 
Periodicals
� 
E-Mail Listservs
� 
View Case Notes
� 
Legislative News
� 
Around the State
� 
News from ATLA
            

PaTLA: fostering public awareness and understanding of the role of the trial lawyer in the administration of justice.

Shopping Cart


Safety belts often fail to protect vehicle occupants
in rollover crashes, consumer group reports

Increased belt use has not slowed growing number
of fatalities on U.S. Roads; belts should be redesigned

(4/21/2004) -- Public Citizen, a nonprofit consumer advocacy organization based in Washington, D.C., has issued a new report indicating that flaws in the design and performance of safety belts leave vehicle occupants vulnerable to serious and often fatal injuries in rollover crashes. According to a press statement issued by Public Citizen, there is no federal safety standard for belt performance in rollover crashes, and the auto industry has done little to design belts to fully protect occupants in these crashes. Public Citizen is calling Congress to enact vehicle safety measures in S.1072, a comprehensive approach to making rollover crashes survivable.

As rollover-prone SUVs proliferate on U.S. roads, fatalities in rollover crashes have climbed to one-third of all vehicle occupant fatalities, or 10,600 each year, according to Public Citizen. The three risks of rollover - roof crush, ejection from the vehicle and belt failure - combine to make rollover crashes unnecessarily deadly. All three of the risks compromise or destroy occupants' survival space during a crash and are inter-related. For example, roof crush becomes more deadly as seat belt use increases.

The auto industry continues to blame drivers and passengers for failing to use safety belts, but belt use is at an historic high and rollover fatalities are not abating, according to the press statement.

According to Public Citizen, the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA) actively promotes belt use and is requesting $150 million for this program next year. But its most recent regulatory move on safety belts came in 1999, when - under heavy pressure from automakers - it removed a portion of its 1967 standard that described a belt's required position in relation to the occupant's pelvis in a rollover crash, Public Citizen said.

"Safety belts are currently the most important safety feature that would keep people secure and inside the vehicle during a rollover crash," said Public Citizen President Joan Claybrook. "It is inexcusable to install belts that do not do the job. The auto industry has known for decades how to design belts to better protect occupants in rollover crashes but has failed to do so."

According to Public Citizen, statistics show that while safety belts usually keep occupants from being completely ejected from a vehicle during a rollover, they often allow partial ejection, which is deadly. Moreover, six of 10 occupants who suffer serious or fatal injuries in rollovers inside the vehicle were wearing a safety belt, according to NHTSA.

Public Citizen's report also pointed out a troubling discrepancy between observed belt use and rollover fatalities. Average belt use by SUV occupants is slightly higher than passenger car occupants, but recorded belt use by SUV occupants killed in rollovers is much lower than passenger car occupants killed in rollovers. The discrepancy suggests that some SUV occupants may come out of belts during the crash, or the belts may otherwise fail.

The report, Rolling Over on Safety: The Hidden Failures of Belts in Rollover Crashes, on the Web at http://www.citizen.org/documents/belt_report.pdf describes ways in which belt failures expose occupants to serious and deadly injury:

· Most belt systems lack rollover sensors that would engage pretensioners and fail to pull slack in quickly enough to prevent occupants from contacting hard vehicle surfaces.

· Current standard belt systems permit lateral movement of occupants' heads and bodies during rollovers, allowing impact with roof pillars or partial or full ejection of occupants through side windows or weakened doors.

· Belt straps are anchored to the door frame instead of the seat, undercutting the belts' effectiveness when the frame or door is deformed or torn off during a rollover.

· Lap belts are anchored behind occupants' hips, rather than directly below. Belts are not effective in preventing people in rollovers from coming up out of the belts and toward the roof. It would be better for belts to wrap across the hips.

· Some safety belts unlatch during rollovers, which occurs during interaction with the vehicle interior or occupants that unlock the belt buckle, leaving occupants without the belt's protection.

PaTLA 121 South Broad Street, Suite 600 Philadelphia, PA, 19107
Tel   215.546.6451 Fax  215.546.5430
Copyright © 2004, PaTLA All Rights Reserved